There Is No Single "Best" Cost Segregation Company
The best cost segregation provider depends on your property size, budget, complexity, and risk tolerance. A $400K rental duplex has different needs than a $15M hotel. This comparison helps you match the right provider type to your situation.
Author's note (Sam Young, EA): I run Overline, so this comparison is not perfectly neutral. But I have tried to be accurate about where we win and where we do not. If a traditional engineering firm is the better choice for your property, this page should help you identify that.
The Four Types of Cost Segregation Providers
Type 1: Modern, Data-Driven Engineering Firms (e.g., Overline)
How it works: These firms combine modern data and AI tools — property records, satellite and street-level imagery, construction databases, and owner-provided photos — with licensed engineer analysis to identify and classify building components. The technology accelerates the data collection; the engineer handles the professional judgment and final classifications. Physical site inspections are available when the property warrants it.
Cost: $499–$4,500 (flat fee)
Turnaround: 1–3 weeks (longer if on-site inspection is included)
Best for: Single-family rentals, small multifamily (2–50 units), short-term rentals, office, retail, and other standard property types valued at $300K–$10M.
Strengths:
- 50–70% cheaper than traditional-only engineering firms
- Same engineering methodology and IRS defensibility
- Faster delivery through streamlined data collection
- Physical inspections available for properties that need them
- Flat fee pricing (no incentive to inflate classifications)
- Audit defense included
- Lower minimum property threshold (profitable for properties as small as $300K basis)
Limitations:
- Not every study includes an on-site visit by default (available on request or when warranted by property complexity)
- Less suited for highly specialized industrial or institutional properties without adding an inspection
- Newer business model (less track record than 30-year-old firms)
Type 2: Traditional Engineering Firms
How it works: An engineer physically visits the property, photographs every component, reviews construction blueprints, and prepares a detailed asset-by-asset classification. This is the original cost segregation methodology.
Cost: $5,000–$15,000+ (sometimes higher for large commercial)
Turnaround: 6–12 weeks
Best for: Large commercial properties ($10M+), highly specialized buildings (hospitals, manufacturing, data centers), institutional investors requiring on-site documentation.
Strengths:
- Physical inspection provides the most detailed component analysis
- Longest track record in the industry
- Some institutional lenders or partners require on-site studies
- Best option for complex, unique, or high-value properties
Limitations:
- Expensive — pricing makes it uneconomical for properties under $500K–$750K
- Slow turnaround due to scheduling and travel
- Price variation is high (get multiple quotes)
- Some firms use outdated methodologies
Type 3: CPA Desk Studies
How it works: A CPA or tax professional applies industry-average percentages to your property's depreciable basis. No engineering analysis. The percentages come from published databases or the CPA's experience with similar properties.
Cost: $1,500–$4,000
Turnaround: 1–4 weeks
Best for: Quick estimates for tax planning. Situations where the investor wants a rough number before committing to a full study.
Strengths:
- Faster and cheaper than a full engineering study
- May be sufficient for straightforward properties in low-audit-risk situations
- Some CPAs bundle it with tax preparation
Limitations:
- Not engineering-based — the IRS ATG specifically references engineering expertise
- Lower audit defensibility
- Template-based percentages may not reflect your specific property
- No named engineer on the report
- If audited, the CPA who prepared it may not have the engineering credentials to defend the classifications
Type 4: DIY Cost Segregation Software
How it works: You enter your property address, purchase price, and a few details into a website or app. The software generates a report using generic allocation tables.
Cost: $99–$500
Turnaround: Instant to 48 hours
Best for: Screening only — determining whether cost segregation is worth pursuing before paying for a professional study.
Strengths:
- Cheapest option
- Fast results
- Useful as a pre-screen tool
Limitations:
- Not audit-defensible
- No engineering methodology
- No named professional signs the report
- Generic allocations not specific to your property
- If you claim deductions based solely on DIY software, you are at elevated audit risk
- The IRS could impose negligence penalties (IRC section 6662) if classifications are unsupported
Side-by-Side Comparison Table
| Feature | Overline (Modern Engineering) | Traditional Firm | CPA Desk Study | DIY Software |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing | $499–$4,500 | $5,000–$15,000+ | $1,500–$4,000 | $99–$500 |
| Methodology | Data-driven + engineer review | On-site engineering | Industry averages | Generic templates |
| IRS Defensibility | High | Highest | Moderate | Low |
| Named Engineer | Yes | Yes | Usually no | No |
| Follows IRS ATG | Yes | Yes | Partially | No |
| Audit Defense | Included | Usually included | Varies | Not available |
| Turnaround | 1–3 weeks | 6–12 weeks | 1–4 weeks | Instant |
| Best Property Size | $300K–$10M | $5M–$50M+ | Any (as estimate) | Screening only |
| Site Visit | Available (on request or when warranted) | Yes (standard) | No | No |
| Flat Fee | Yes | Usually | Sometimes | Yes |
Which Provider Type by Property Size
This is the decision tree we recommend:
Under $300K Depreciable Basis
Recommendation: Run the free calculator first. At this property size, the study fee relative to expected savings makes cost segregation marginal for most investors. If the calculator shows strong ROI, Overline's $499 starting price makes it feasible. Traditional firm pricing ($5,000+) likely makes it uneconomical.
$300K–$1M Depreciable Basis
Recommendation: Overline or a similar modern engineering firm. This is the sweet spot where traditional firms are too expensive but the tax savings are meaningful. At $500K basis with 28% reclassification and a 35% tax rate, you are looking at roughly $49,000 in first-year savings. A $1,500 Overline study delivers 33x ROI. An $8,000 traditional study delivers 6x ROI.
$1M–$5M Depreciable Basis
Recommendation: Overline or traditional firm — compare proposals. Both deliver engineering-based studies. The question is whether a full on-site inspection adds meaningful accuracy for your specific property type. For standard property types (residential, office, retail, multifamily), Overline's data-driven approach with optional site visits is accurate and significantly cheaper. For unique construction or specialized properties, a traditional on-site inspection may add value.
$5M–$10M Depreciable Basis
Recommendation: Get proposals from both Overline and a traditional firm. At this property size, both are cost-effective. The decision comes down to turnaround time, pricing, and whether on-site inspection adds meaningful accuracy for your specific property.
Over $10M Depreciable Basis
Recommendation: Traditional engineering firm is the default choice for institutional-quality properties. Consider Overline if you want a faster or more affordable alternative, but understand that highly complex properties (hospitals, manufacturing, data centers) may benefit from physical inspection.
The Pricing Reality Check
Most investors overestimate what cost segregation should cost and underestimate the ROI:
| Property Value | Study Cost (Overline) | Study Cost (Traditional) | Typical Year-1 Savings (35% bracket) | ROI (Overline) | ROI (Traditional) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $400K | ~$800 | ~$5,000 | ~$28,000 | 35x | 5.6x |
| $750K | ~$1,500 | ~$7,000 | ~$52,000 | 35x | 7.4x |
| $1.5M | ~$2,500 | ~$10,000 | ~$105,000 | 42x | 10.5x |
| $3M | ~$3,500 | ~$12,000 | ~$210,000 | 60x | 17.5x |
Assumptions: 20% land value, 28% average reclassification, 100% bonus depreciation, 35% combined tax rate.
The math is clear: For properties under $5M, the pricing difference between provider types dramatically impacts your net ROI. The engineering methodology is the same. The study cost is not.
Common Misconceptions
"Cheaper studies must be lower quality"
Not necessarily. Overline's studies are cheaper because modern data tools streamline the property analysis and component identification that traditional firms do entirely on-site. The engineering judgment — classifying components into the correct MACRS recovery periods — is still performed by licensed professionals. The technology improved the delivery model, not the analysis quality. And when a property needs a physical inspection, Overline provides one.
"On-site inspection is always necessary"
For many standard property types, detailed analysis using property records, imagery, construction databases, and owner-provided photos produces equally accurate results. On-site inspection adds value for complex, specialized, or one-of-a-kind properties where construction details cannot be determined remotely. For a standard SFR, duplex, or apartment complex, a mandatory on-site visit is often unnecessary overhead — though Overline will include one when the property warrants it or the owner requests it.
"My CPA can do cost segregation"
Some CPAs offer cost segregation, but most deliver desk studies — not engineering-based analyses. There is nothing wrong with a CPA desk study as a planning estimate, but understand that it provides lower audit defensibility than an engineering-based study. If your CPA is partnering with an engineering firm to deliver the study, that is different (and better).
"All cost segregation studies are basically the same"
They are not. The reclassification percentage your study identifies depends heavily on the methodology, the expertise of the preparer, and the level of property-specific analysis. We have reviewed competitor studies where the reclassification was off by 5–10 percentage points in either direction — either too aggressive (audit risk) or too conservative (leaving money on the table).
When Overline Is Not the Right Choice
Transparency matters more than sales. Here is when you should look elsewhere:
- You have a $25M+ hospital or manufacturing facility — These properties have highly specialized systems where a traditional firm with deep domain-specific experience (e.g., healthcare construction, semiconductor manufacturing) may add value beyond what a generalist engineering review provides.
- Your institutional lender has specific study format requirements — Some commercial lending agreements specify particular report formats or firms. Check your loan documents.
- You only need a rough planning estimate — A $1,500 CPA desk study or even a free calculator estimate may be sufficient. Do not pay for a full study until you are ready to claim the deductions.
- Your property has depreciable basis under $200K — At any price point, the ROI may be too thin. Run the free calculator first.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What are the best cost segregation companies? A: The best provider depends on your property size and budget. For properties under $5M, modern data-driven engineering firms like Overline offer the best combination of pricing ($499–$4,500), methodology (engineering-based with optional site inspections), and defensibility (engineer-reviewed with audit defense). For properties over $10M with complex construction, traditional engineering firms may be more appropriate. CPA desk studies work for planning estimates but offer lower audit defensibility.
Q: How much does a cost segregation study cost? A: Pricing ranges from $499 to $15,000+ depending on the provider type and property size. Overline charges $499–$4,500 (flat fee). Traditional engineering firms charge $5,000–$15,000+. CPA desk studies cost $1,500–$4,000. DIY software costs $99–$500 but is not audit-defensible. The key is ROI — most studies deliver 10x–50x+ return on the study cost.
Q: Is Overline a legitimate cost segregation company? A: Yes. Overline uses data-driven engineering methodology with licensed engineer review on every study, and provides physical inspections when warranted. Studies follow the IRS Cost Segregation Audit Techniques Guide, include detailed depreciation schedules, and come with lifetime IRS audit defense. The company is run by Sam Young, EA (Stanford MBA), and has delivered over 1,000 studies.
Q: What is the cheapest cost segregation option that is still IRS-defensible? A: Overline's studies start at $499 and are engineering-based with engineer review — making them the most affordable IRS-defensible option currently available. DIY tools are cheaper ($99–$500) but are not considered defensible in an audit. CPA desk studies ($1,500–$4,000) are moderately defensible but not engineering-based.
Q: Should I get multiple cost segregation quotes? A: Yes, especially for properties over $1M. Compare methodology (engineering-based vs desk study), pricing structure (flat fee vs percentage), turnaround time, and whether audit defense is included. Ask each provider the questions from our provider evaluation checklist.
Q: Can I switch cost segregation providers if I am unhappy with my current study? A: Yes. You can commission a new study from a different provider at any time. The new study supersedes the previous one for tax filing purposes. If the original study was deficient, a new properly-engineered study can also be used to amend prior returns via Form 3115.
Continue Reading
- How to Choose a Cost Segregation Provider — The complete 10-point evaluation checklist
- Why Our Studies Cost 50% Less — How modern methodology reduces costs without sacrificing quality
- Why Cost Segregation Is a Bad Idea (Sometimes) — The 7 situations where cost seg does not make sense
- Is Cost Segregation Worth It? — Decision framework based on 1,000+ studies
- Cost Segregation Audit Risk — What actually triggers IRS scrutiny
Disclaimer: This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an endorsement or criticism of any specific company. Pricing and service details are based on publicly available information and industry benchmarks as of February 2026. Individual experiences may vary. This content does not constitute tax, legal, or financial advice. Consult qualified professionals regarding your specific circumstances.